nawerhacker.blogg.se

Explantion of output in comprehensive meta analysis
Explantion of output in comprehensive meta analysis







explantion of output in comprehensive meta analysis

Improvements in depression and anxiety were positively associated with improved engagement ER skills, reduced emotion dysregulation and reduced disengagement ER skills. The meta-analysis includes 385 effect sizes from 90 RCTs with total N = 11,652. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2.0 tool.

explantion of output in comprehensive meta analysis

Medline, Embase, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library were searched up to 26 June 2020. Inclusion criteria included studies that were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of a psychological intervention for depression and/or anxiety in patients aged 14–24, were peer reviewed, were written in English, measured depression and/or anxiety symptoms as an outcome and measured ER as an outcome. A multivariate, random-effects meta-analysis was run using metafor in R. This meta-analysis examined whether improvements in ER skills were associated with psychological treatment outcomes for depression and/or anxiety in youth. Difficulties in applying emotional regulation (ER) skills are associated with depression and anxiety symptoms, and are common targets of treatment.









Explantion of output in comprehensive meta analysis